<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disruption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pribek.net/2006/07/07/disruption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pribek.net/2006/07/07/disruption/</link>
	<description>Trouble Ain't Over</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pribek</title>
		<link>http://pribek.net/2006/07/07/disruption/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Pribek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 13:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pribek.net/?p=8#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stephanie, I was thinking about what I wrote here and, there is one thing that's bugging me. When I said I admire the showbiz quotient, I was thinking of acts like Alice Cooper or Sam Kinison, that use shock value as a tool. It's a time honored practice. I am having a hard time remebering many performers using this device with such disregard for peoples feelings. The more I see this picture, the more it disturbs me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stephanie, I was thinking about what I wrote here and, there is one thing that&#8217;s bugging me. When I said I admire the showbiz quotient, I was thinking of acts like Alice Cooper or Sam Kinison, that use shock value as a tool. It&#8217;s a time honored practice. I am having a hard time remebering many performers using this device with such disregard for peoples feelings. The more I see this picture, the more it disturbs me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Vann</title>
		<link>http://pribek.net/2006/07/07/disruption/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Vann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 12:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pribek.net/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>According to the dictionary sitting on my computer desk, to disrupt is to interrupt, or to throw into turmoil or disorder. I guess in that respect their use of it as to challenge and overturn assumptions isn't a bad one, although I would question whether the definition really includes new possibilities and visionary ideas. I suspect your suggestion that it is merely a polite cover for the term shock value isn't far from the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the dictionary sitting on my computer desk, to disrupt is to interrupt, or to throw into turmoil or disorder. I guess in that respect their use of it as to challenge and overturn assumptions isn&#8217;t a bad one, although I would question whether the definition really includes new possibilities and visionary ideas. I suspect your suggestion that it is merely a polite cover for the term shock value isn&#8217;t far from the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
