<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pribek.net/2007/06/06/logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pribek.net/2007/06/06/logo/</link>
	<description>Trouble Ain't Over</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jayne d'Arcy</title>
		<link>http://pribek.net/2007/06/06/logo/comment-page-1/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayne d'Arcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pribek.net/2007/06/06/logo/#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>I like both your logos, Jack.  The first is smooth, and I like the shape of it.  It has more of a lasting look to it than the second one does.  The second one looks like spray paint graffiti, which might make for a good, one time use, on a different album.

That 2012 Olympic logo is really bad.  It really does not look like any effort whatsoever was put into the design.  It appears amateurish and I'd really hate to see that splashed everywhere for the next games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like both your logos, Jack.  The first is smooth, and I like the shape of it.  It has more of a lasting look to it than the second one does.  The second one looks like spray paint graffiti, which might make for a good, one time use, on a different album.</p>
<p>That 2012 Olympic logo is really bad.  It really does not look like any effort whatsoever was put into the design.  It appears amateurish and I&#8217;d really hate to see that splashed everywhere for the next games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Vann</title>
		<link>http://pribek.net/2007/06/06/logo/comment-page-1/#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Vann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pribek.net/2007/06/06/logo/#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>As I live in the UK, I've been hearing a lot about that logo recently. We had big articles splashed over many major newspapers. According to reports, not only does it not look like 2012 (and I have to admit I didn't get that straight off myself) but some claim it looks like a swastika and others that it sent people into epileptic fits. I've no idea whether the latter or not is actually true, but if it is, it doesn't seem like a good thing.

Personally, I don't like it. I think it just looks like a mess. But if you take the perspective that all publicity is good publicity then maybe it's doing it's job after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I live in the UK, I&#8217;ve been hearing a lot about that logo recently. We had big articles splashed over many major newspapers. According to reports, not only does it not look like 2012 (and I have to admit I didn&#8217;t get that straight off myself) but some claim it looks like a swastika and others that it sent people into epileptic fits. I&#8217;ve no idea whether the latter or not is actually true, but if it is, it doesn&#8217;t seem like a good thing.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t like it. I think it just looks like a mess. But if you take the perspective that all publicity is good publicity then maybe it&#8217;s doing it&#8217;s job after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
