Dr J had a post the other day entitled, “Eulogy for the Instrumental?“, about the lack of instrumental hit songs. Why is that? J’s post covers a lot of possible reasons. I made a comment there which he asked me to expound on and, looking at what I wrote in reply, I don’t think I made a very concise point. This may not come as a surprise to many of you. So, I will now, make an attempt to clarify.

The last period that instrumental music had a big impact on pop culture was the late 50’s and early 60’s. There were a lot of them being released and some huge hit records came out of it.

What’s different now? You can say the industry is different, sure. You can say that the listener’s, the consumer’s, tastes have changed, sure. In the post, Dr. J sites a Slate article that delves in to these factors. The Dr. addresses another factor that must be brought to the equation, the composers.

Many of the composers that are really good at crafting music are lured into the film scoring field. The trouble is, their work is often so watered down by cuts and producer changes, it becomes a “work for hire” composition rather than truly a part of the composer’s voice. Or maybe we’re just waiting for the next Beethoven to be born…

I think he’s got a good point there. The movie business tips more than the music business makes. It is natural that talented and competent composers would drift to where the money is.

I think there is still another side to this. On an instrumental song/record, the main instrumentalist is playing the melody. Another way to look at it is, the main instrument is doing the part that the lead singer would be doing on a vocal record. So, the main instrument is the voice. Just like on a vocal record, you have to have a good composition and the artist has to interpret the composition well. In the history of pop music, the artist is often the composer but, in that case, the same rule applies.

I think that musicians are thinking differently than they did when instrumental records were popular. They think differently and therefore, play differently. Not worse or better, differently.

If you are discussing instrumental hit songs in the rock era, Duane Eddy is part of the discussion-has to be because, he sold millions of instrumental records. Here is a clip of Duane playing “Rebel Rouser” on the Letterman show. There is an interesting bit of dialog, after the performance, when Duane is over on the couch. Dave points out that Eddy made the first rock & roll album that was recorded in stereo. When Dave hears that the title was, “Have Twangy Guitar, Will Travel”, he reacts with a little sarcasm and Duane states that the record sold “about 3 million”. If a guy with a guitar sold 3 million records today, he would be everywhere. He would be the huge thing in the music world.

This next clip is Duane discussing some of his influences. Near the end of the clip, he mentions Billy Byrd who was best know for his work with Ernest Tubb.

ernest-and-troubadours.jpg

Billy Byrd was a master of simplicity. In this video, while discussing Byrd, Duane gets to the heart of the issue; “If you are going to do an instrumental it’s gotta be something you can remember-that people can remember. It’s got to pierce their brains you know.”

See, I just don’t see a lot of players today that are thinking that way. When was the last time you heard a country record where the instrumental solo, between vocals, just repeated the melody ala Billy Byrd? You don’t hear it because players aren’t thinking that way. Here’s the logic; The listener is already familiar with the melody because the singer has been singing it. They are comfortable with it. If the soloist plays that same melody, the listener then picks up on the tonal nuances particular to that instrument. The instrument becomes a “voice”, a personality. Because the listener is already comfortable with the choice of notes, it frees them up to concentrate on those nuances. Duane Eddy used the Billy Byrd aesthetic to sell millions of rock & roll records without ever singing a note.

Not only that, he made a conscious decision to it. That is a highly evolved space for a musician. Don’t think for a minute that Duane Eddy couldn’t play flashy. Instead, he made the very wise and thoughtful decision to play for the listener. Take a look at this clip of Duane playing the Merle Travis tune, “Cannonball Rag”.

That is something that most cats walking around with a gig bag can not do. That kind of playing takes a lot of dexterity, technique and musicality. Duane does it flawlessly and effortlessly. Here’s another thing, I guarantee you that he has more in the trick bag than that. I guarantee you he can “shred”. But, he isn’t ever going to show all his cards and he’s always going to put the listener, the average person, first.

That is the kind of approach that I don’t see a lot of with musicians these days. I’m not saying it doesn’t exist. It’s still there but, I see less of it than I used to.

That’s not a complaint either. I love to hear a great musician just going for it. I like to hear that kind of playing but, I’m a musician. Hell, I’m excited that Return To Forever is getting back together and going to tour. I’d pay to see those guys. What percentage of the audience at those shows will be musicians?

That is a true “niche” market. Music made for and sold to musicians. That’s what most instrumental records are these days. It’s not bad work if you can get it. The audience is one that truly appreciates what the artist is doing.

But, for an instrumentalist to tap in to the “mainstream”, that requires a completely different mindset. And, it’s a stacked deck because, the mainstream isn’t accustomed to consuming instrumental music at this point. The industry, the whole industry is scrambling to keep their livelihood so, they aren’t going to be all in on an instrumental record-no way. So, for an instrumental record to be a hit record right now, it would be coming out of nowhere. It would have to be something that would, “pierce their brains you know”.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , ,

"Pierce Their Brains-Duane Eddy and the Billy Byrd Aesthetic" by Pribek was published on March 15th, 2008 and is listed in Music, Pop Culture.

Follow comments via the RSS Feed | Leave a comment

Comments on "Pierce Their Brains-Duane Eddy and the Billy Byrd Aesthetic": 8 Comments

  1. J wrote,

    Are you sure you’re not a lawyer? You sure know how to build a good case! Excellent post.
    ;-)

  2. Pribek wrote,

    Hah Hah…I learned every thing I know from watching re-runs of “Matlock”.
    Thanks, J

  3. Pat Darnell and friends wrote,

    Dear Jack:
    I am still getting a lot of satisfaction from the Gibson free music site. Thanks for sharing all the drainage from your brain, Bohunk. I hope you never tires of it. You are the musicians’s musicican, for sure, as are the commentors in your site..

    Only one FAQ for ye today: Honestly don’t you think this is a generational mother/father/uncle to son/daughter/shaver/strapper thing, and should be treated as such? …like apprenticeships? >mpw

    Pat Darnell and friends’s last blog post..Internet Technology Can’t be that Simple!!!!!!!

  4. Pribek wrote,

    I’m not sure quite what you’re getting at there PD&F

  5. Pat Darnell and Friends wrote,

    I was anticipating the next entry above about JC… you know pair-of-normal-kicks sort of t’ing. Simply, a happy man is the man who marries the right woman and has beautiful kids.

    You know everyone across rural America in the 1800’s- 1900’s had a piano in their home and at least one of the children played it well. My mother is the one in her family who played for the family, out of her five siblings. She also played for the various Methodist Sunday services in western Tennessee, where her dad was the rural route minister. My kid sister is the one who plays the piano in our family, and her son.

    My dad wanted to be an oil painter like his grandmother. I am the kid of four who has picked up that one. And so on…

    I don’t know if you know how terribly lacking arts and music programs have become in our state run school systems, nationwide. I suspect the gap I experience in “live” ameteur talent is because states cut arts/music budgets first, ahead of sports or academic.

    So, I think if I could let kids know it is okay to perform and not have to sound just like recordings… it would get us all back on a track of happiness.

  6. Pribek wrote,

    OK, I’m pondering on all of that now Pat and, I will reply once I’ve thought it through.

    In the meantime, it occurs to me, that we haven’t got around to talking about your artwork except in quick passing. It also occurs, that the only paintings of yours that I have seen were the ones that you painted as a little shaver; the one’s you showed me down in Housrton circa Nineteen Eighty *&%&^. How do we rectify this?

  7. Pat wrote,

    Ohh… errr, I sold some and lost the slides of them, but I have some I can send you a photo email soon… just have to take the pictures. Besides that, Dad now eighty five, started at 79 taking lessons with a neighborhood artist group, he is oil painting. I always dreamed he and I could share at least one thing. And we have found each other in this respect.

    Oh yeah, here are three posts that I did for Dad… illustrations of thoughts behind a picture… There are other hints of paintings in Moopigwisdom…

    http://moopigwisdom.blogspot.com/2007/12/wherever-we-are-we-have-our-spirit-of.html

    http://moopigwisdom.blogspot.com/2007/12/blog-post.html

    http://moopigwisdom.blogspot.com/2007/12/blog-post_28.html
    – but –

    I will reply once I’ve thought it through.

    In my Utopian Dream World, entertainers have their own school. It isn’t like other schools, as it would have to be totally experiential, like growing up on a farm.

    I think it would lead to better preservation of the entertainment. For instance, I was on Bourbon Street and Canal [GPS: OnStar where am I?], I think, near the Preservation Hall Jazz, where if I stood in the middle of the intersection, I heard four separate types of music. Delta Rhythm and Blues, Dixieland Jazz, outstanding karaoke performances, and Piano Bar… in other words a world of art in each of four establishments, otherwise unattainable.

    You don’t have to reply, I know you are very busy with developments there. I just like coming over here and practicing my typing.

    In my narrow view of music business, you kind, and gentle entertainers are first outsiders. You arrive, then enter the insider scene. Once accepted though you become the insiders.

    I know lots of Accountants today who were in Rock Bands of the sixties. I feel this is a terrible thing to happen to the artist side of you. If you had your own school then you might be able to remain outsiders, and always fully extend yourselves in your artistry. Eh?

    We are updating the computers this week, so I might give you all a break for a while… halleluya… oh stop it you guys, I’m not that bad!!! >pd_in_full

    btw: do I owe you any $$?

  8. Sans Direction wrote,

    Not touching the discussion thread.

    Techno is today’s instrumental music. There’s strong themes in a lot of it. There’s some connections. And there’s still something lost.

    I blame the record industry choosing their own winners for at least some of it, but people who make instrumental music are more likely to be strongly connected to their Miles Davis and Coltrane albums or the people influenced by them, or perhaps even Kraftwerk, than by Duane Eddy, Dick Dale, and the rest of those 50s and 60s instrumental guys. They’re missing a big trick there, to be sure.

    I was just trying to pick up “Rebel Rouser” the other day. That, “Sugarfoot Rag” and “Buckaroo” are on my current practice list.

    Sans Direction’s last blog post..Won’t buy back the beat of a heart grown cold

Leave Your Comment

Subscribe without commenting

Pribek is powered by WordPress

Wearing the Resolution Green Skin for Shifter by Buzzdroid